Song Meanings

Take On Me by a-ha: The Meaning Behind the Song

♪ 5 min read July 18, 2026

It failed twice. The same song, released and re-released, sank without trace both times. Then a director spent sixteen weeks drawing over three thousand frames of film by hand, and it went to number one in America.

Here is what the title means, where the synth riff came from, and why the third attempt worked when the first two did not.

The Short Answer

It is an invitation. The narrator is asking someone to take a chance on him, admitting he is not sure of himself and asking anyway. The phrasing is slightly off in English, which is what happens when Norwegians write in their second language, and the oddness is part of why the line stuck.

The Story Behind the Song

The riff came first, and it came from a teenager. Magne Furuholmen wrote the main synth figure when he was fifteen, in a band called Bridges that he and Pal Waaktaar had before a-ha existed. It appeared in a song called “Miss Eerie,” which the band considered too pop for what they were doing.

Bridges broke up. Waaktaar and Furuholmen moved to London with singer Morten Harket, and the riff came with them. All three share the writing credit on the finished song.

Warner Bros. released the first version in October 1984, produced by Tony Mansfield. It reached number three in Norway and charted nowhere else. The label brought in producer Alan Tarney, who rebuilt it with more energy and a proper coda instead of a fade. That version was released in April 1985 and flopped again.

What made the third release work?

A video. Jeff Ayeroff, an executive who had moved to Warner Bros. and championed the band, commissioned a new one and hired Steve Barron, whose credits already included “Billie Jean” and “Don’t You Want Me.”

Barron built it around rotoscoping, an animation technique from the 1920s in which live-action film is traced frame by frame. Animators Michael Patterson and Candace Reckinger drew over roughly three thousand frames across sixteen weeks. The story has Harket as a comic-book motorcycle racer who pulls a woman, played by Bunty Bailey, into the page with him and then fights his way out into her world.

It was filmed at a cafe on the corner of Wandsworth Road in London and on a sound stage. The treatment had originally been assigned to a different song from the album, “Train of Thought,” and was reassigned.

How successful was it?

Number one on the Billboard Hot 100 in October 1985, twenty-seven weeks on that chart, and number one in a dozen countries. In Britain, where it had failed twice, it reached number two and stayed there three weeks.

At the 1986 MTV Video Music Awards the video won six of its eight nominations, a record for the ceremony at that point. The band did not attend, choosing to play a show in Houston instead. It remains a-ha’s only American number one.

What is the song about?

Nerve, mostly. The narrator admits he is talking away without saying anything, acknowledges that the thing he is asking for is a gamble for both of them, and pushes for an answer anyway. There is no story and no scene.

The vagueness is why the video could invent a plot for it. Nothing in the lyric contradicts a man being trapped in a comic book, because nothing in the lyric describes anywhere at all.

What is that high note?

Morten Harket’s, at the end of the chorus, and it sits close to the top of what a male pop singer can reach in full voice. It is the reason the song functions as a test at karaoke and the reason most people attempting it stop halfway through the last line.

Harket had trained as a singer before joining the band, which is unusual in synth-pop and audible throughout. The record pairs a machine-made backing with a voice doing something no machine was doing in 1985.

What was it played on?

Furuholmen played the main melody on a Roland Juno-60 connected to a Yamaha DX7, and the version with the famous video used a LinnDrum machine, with real cymbals and hi-hat overdubbed on top.

That combination is a large part of the record’s sound: warm analogue synthesizer against digital brightness, with enough live percussion to keep it from feeling programmed.

Why did the video matter so much?

Because MTV in 1985 could turn a failed single into a global hit, and because Barron’s video did something nobody had seen. Everything else on the channel was people playing instruments or acting out a scene. This was a drawing coming alive.

Ayeroff has described falling for the song first and then seeing a photograph of the band, and the video was built to make the most of both. An unfinished cut was sent to him early and ended up being played on air, which suited everyone.

Why it lasted

Because it is two things that both hold up. The record is a well-made pop song with a hook a fifteen-year-old wrote and an impossible note at the end. The video is a piece of animation that people still watch on its own terms, four decades later, with more than a billion views.

Most eighties hits survive on nostalgia. This one survives on craft, which is why it keeps recruiting listeners who were not born when it came out.

Songs that reach people through a video rather than a record often arrive with no title attached at all; when you have the images and the melody, our song lyrics search can name it.

More song meanings